A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours around the development of the wall at a coastal internet site within a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide attention following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building is effective at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, seek out to build their loved ones household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up citizens. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their planning permission by building a wall beyond the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment over a Exclusive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result parts are topic to strict controls below European and Irish environmental law. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, especially inside a delicate coastal natural environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their planning permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the correct situation. Their lawful crew has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, wherever views of the sea are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-large water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, a picture that has considering that come to be emblematic from the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they have been intended to Get Visible evidence on the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website became The most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely noted that such actions were being cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included intimately with the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment within the lawful timeline.
At the Main with the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and ailments attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is motivated by problem for environmental security and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting rather that it is about ensuring that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got described their long-standing relationship to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically trying to build a family members property in accordance Using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Place of Conservation and say that all is effective have been carried out based upon Expert information and accredited programs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean throughout a storm, will not alter the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above development of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description for your situation that many observers see as more and more widespread. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved with local advocacy on setting up and environmental problems, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from very unique professional backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by waistline-higher h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical fact of the coastline along with the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal strategy.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the end result remains uncertain. The courtroom will have to establish whether the wall as designed complies with organizing permission and whether or not Accountant Paul Feely any encroachment into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell along with one another lengthy following the legal costs happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the case prolong beyond that handle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems including environmental safety and house rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of purely natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre of your dispute stands partly constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. Whether it'll in the long run be altered, taken out, or finished as planned will count on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most intently viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.